Thursday, 29 August 2024

The Fourth Estate as Agenda-Setter: Media’s Rising Influence on Government Priorities :

Agenda Meeting Images – Browse 218,763 Stock Photos, Vectors, and Video |  Adobe Stock

Agenda setting forms a very nascent part of Public Policy formulation. The very word "Agenda Setting" itself inclines/depicts the sheer top-down model. 

Now, as our media, per say has evolved from its traditional form ( Doordarshan times, AIR) to the present form of live-instantaneous reporting kind ( ANI, PTI, twitter, media, etc). The entire contour of agenda setting by the government has changed in multifaceted terms - 

1.Feedback is now instantaneous ( negative eg.- Lateral entry- within hours , the agenda felt down/modified the agenda itself // positive eg.- WAQF bill sent to JPC got applaud immediately,EWS reservations & LPG subsidy give away program got a go-ahead from all circles. ) 

2.Accountability is circular now - ( as soon as the gov brought in the agenda of UCC - all the stakeholders - started giving their take on it ).

3.Demand of the New Agendas itself started across the sectors - thus bottom up centricity - eg. NIRBHAYA amendment in the laws case// PLI scheme push forwarded from industrial group like SIAM etc// MSP demand along with a committee established to look into it came into the picture after the extensive all round coverage from media ( through twitter, broadcasting media, newspapers, live debates, etc ) and thus the agenda of bringing "New farm laws" was taken back.

This high entropic environment created by the bombardment of medias ( in various facets as well as in various linguistic groups - like u have not just AAJ TAK now, but UP TAK, Bihar TAK, etc. ) is a double edged sword.


On one end it has all the benefits - like Stakeholder decision making // faster redressal of grievances ( twitter - railway grievances)  reducing the overall time of collecting of feedback etc.


At the other end - this very nature of emerging unregulated media can derail the governance process itself. It has the power to create anarchy through falsified informations, more prominently in the age of AI. Examples of incidents like- Tuticorin plant issue reported in a falsified manner, Cambridge Analytica, Pegasus). This can be a potent tool to set the agenda of other deep states as in the name of GOI.


Remember MEDIA has got the power of amplification of the discourse at large which has eventually made the government in a reactive mode instead of the responsive mode earlier.


Therefore, require a healthy democratic climate for all kinds of media to breed and raise issues with full fervour but at the same time need to bring a Law enacted ( with proper legislative scrutiny) to curb its wrong usage ( Like PIB FACT CHECK / BROADCAST BILL ). There is a dire need to re-strategize the entire cadre of IIS OFFICERS. They can do a great service in this regard.


                                            ------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, 25 August 2024

Prioritizing Precision: The Case for Accuracy Over Speed in AI Development & Deployment

In our rapidly advancing technological landscape, the race to innovate and deploy new artificial intelligence (AI) solutions often feels like a sprint. Organisations and industries are quick to adopt AI-driven systems to gain a competitive edge, improve efficiencies, and offer instant gratification to customers. Therefore the CIRCLE OF CONCERN (COC) is getting bigger than the CIRCLE OF INFLUENCE (COI) as far as AI development is concerned. However, as we charge forward with unprecedented speed, the question arises: Are we placing enough emphasis on accuracy ??? In the realm of AI, where the repercussions of decisions can be profound, the world needs accuracy over speed. The need to prioritize precision and reliability has never been more critical, not only for technological advancement but also for ethical considerations and societal trust.

The Importance of Accuracy in AI: A Global and Indian Perspective

AI systems are increasingly being integrated into critical sectors such as healthcare, finance, law enforcement, and transportation. These systems make decisions that directly impact human lives and societal structures. When the stakes are high, accuracy becomes non-negotiable. For example, in healthcare, AI is used to analyze medical images for early cancer detection. A study published in the journal Nature found that AI could detect breast cancer with an accuracy rate of 94.5%, outperforming human radiologists who had an accuracy rate of 88%. However, even with such high accuracy, the remaining margin of error can mean the difference between life and death. Imagine if speed was prioritized over accuracy in such cases—misdiagnoses could lead to unnecessary treatments or, worse, untreated life-threatening conditions.

In India, the healthcare sector stands to benefit immensely from accurate AI deployment. A McKinsey report estimates that AI could help India save $40 billion in healthcare costs by 2025 by enabling accurate early diagnosis, efficient management of healthcare records, and personalized treatment plans. However, for these benefits to be realized, AI systems must be meticulously accurate, especially considering India's diverse population and varying healthcare infrastructure. Speedy but inaccurate AI-driven diagnostics could lead to a healthcare crisis rather than a solution.




Ethical Implications and Bias Mitigation

One of the critical areas where accuracy trumps speed is in the mitigation of bias. AI systems learn from the data they are trained on, and if that data is biased, the AI will replicate and even amplify those biases. This is not a hypothetical concern. A study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that face recognition algorithms were 10 to 100 times more likely to falsely identify the faces of African American and Asian people compared to Caucasian faces. Such inaccuracies have already led to wrongful arrests and could potentially result in severe civil rights violations. It is vital to focus on developing AI models that are accurate and fair, ensuring they are tested and validated across diverse datasets to prevent biased outcomes. Rushing to deploy AI systems without thoroughly addressing accuracy and fairness can lead to ethical breaches and loss of public trust.

In India, the concern around biased AI systems is significant given the country's socio-economic and cultural diversity. The deployment of AI in law enforcement and surveillance, for instance, needs careful calibration. The Telangana state government’s use of AI-based facial recognition to monitor crowds during festivals and protests has sparked debates about privacy and accuracy. If these systems are inaccurate or biased, they could disproportionately target marginalized communities, leading to discrimination and societal unrest. Ensuring accuracy in these systems is crucial to uphold the principles of justice and equality enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

Building Trust Through Reliability

Public trust is foundational for the widespread adoption of AI technologies. Trust is built on reliability, and reliability stems from accuracy. Autonomous vehicles are a prime example where trust is paramount. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 94% of serious crashes are due to human error. AI promises to reduce this number by making precise, data-driven decisions. However, any failure, even a single misjudgment by an autonomous car, can have catastrophic consequences, leading to loss of life and significant public backlash, as seen in high-profile incidents involving self-driving vehicles. The deployment of autonomous driving technology needs rigorous testing and validation to ensure accuracy in decision-making under various real-world scenarios, beyond just speed in commercialization.

India is experiencing rapid urbanization, and with it comes the challenge of managing traffic and ensuring road safety. AI-powered autonomous vehicles have the potential to revolutionize Indian transportation by reducing accidents caused by human error. However, the unique traffic conditions in India—characterized by erratic driving patterns, diverse vehicle types, and often inadequate road infrastructure—make accuracy in AI-driven systems even more crucial. Quick deployment without ensuring accuracy could lead to accidents and a public outcry against the technology, derailing progress in this sector.

The Role of Regulatory Compliance

As AI technology evolves, regulatory frameworks are increasingly emphasizing accuracy and transparency to ensure safety and fairness. For instance, the European Union's AI Act aims to regulate AI applications based on their risk level, demanding stringent compliance for high-risk applications such as biometric identification and critical infrastructure. Companies that focus on accuracy are more likely to align with these emerging regulations, avoiding legal pitfalls and gaining a competitive advantage. Prioritizing accuracy ensures that AI innovations are both compliant with the law and beneficial to society.

India is also moving toward developing regulatory frameworks for AI. The NITI Aayog, India’s policy think tank, released a discussion paper on AI ethics and recommended establishing guidelines that prioritize data quality, accuracy, and transparency. This initiative reflects a recognition that AI solutions tailored for India must address the specific needs and challenges of the Indian context, including linguistic diversity, varying levels of digital literacy, and data privacy concerns. Accurate AI systems are essential for ensuring compliance with these guidelines and fostering trust among users.

Data Quality and Training Models

The foundation of accurate AI systems lies in high-quality data and robust model training. Data is the lifeblood of AI, and inaccurate or biased data can lead to flawed outcomes. According to IBM, poor data quality costs the U.S. economy around $3.1 trillion per year. In AI, the cost is not just economic but can lead to significant societal and ethical implications. Ensuring accuracy requires investing in clean, diverse, and representative datasets, as well as adopting continuous learning models that can adapt and improve over time. AI models should not only be fast but also robust, reliable, and resilient to anomalies, ensuring that their outputs are consistently accurate.

In India, data diversity is both a challenge and an opportunity. With its vast population and numerous languages, ensuring the accuracy of AI models requires a large-scale collection of diverse and high-quality data. Initiatives like India’s Aadhaar, the world's largest biometric identification system, provide an opportunity for training robust AI models. However, this also necessitates stringent checks for accuracy and privacy to prevent misuse and ensure the systems are inclusive and representative of all demographic groups. There is also an urgent need to develop indigenous LLM models along the regional and linguistic diversity in India.

Prioritizing a Balanced Approach

The future of AI hinges on balancing speed with accuracy. While speed can drive efficiency and innovation, accuracy ensures that these advancements are ethical, reliable, and ultimately beneficial to society. AI developers, policymakers, and stakeholders must collaborate to create frameworks that prioritize accuracy, especially in high-stakes environments. This means investing in quality data, rigorous testing, and ethical guidelines that place human well-being at the forefront. Only by valuing accuracy over speed can we harness the true potential of AI while safeguarding against its risks.

In the age of AI, the world does not just need fast answers—it needs the right ones. Accuracy is the cornerstone of building a trustworthy AI-powered future, especially in a diverse and complex society like India’s. By prioritizing accuracy, we can ensure that AI technologies contribute positively to economic growth, social justice, and overall human development.


                -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, 19 August 2024

Is Technology in the Olympics a Form of Doping or a Reality of Modern Sport ?

 In today’s Olympic Games, technology is everywhere—from the slow-motion cameras that capture the difference between first and second place to the wearable sensors that help athletes perfect their form. But as technology continues to advance, it raises an important question: When does the use of technology in sports cross the line from innovation to an unfair advantage? This is where the concept of "technological doping" comes into play.

What Is Technological Doping?

Technological doping refers to the use of advanced equipment or apparel that gives athletes an edge over their competitors. Unlike traditional doping, which involves the use of banned substances, technological doping is more about the tools athletes use—like the Speedo LZR Racer swimsuit or Nike’s super shoes. These innovations can improve performance, but they also spark debates about fairness.

Take the 2008 Beijing Olympics, for example. Athletes wearing the Speedo LZR Racer swimsuit won 94% of the swimming gold medals. The suit was engineered to reduce drag and improve efficiency, leading to a flurry of world records. However, the technology was so effective that it was eventually banned by World Aquatics, the governing body for water sports.

Similarly, in 2019, Kenyan runner Eliud Kipchoge broke the two-hour marathon barrier wearing a bespoke Nike shoe. This achievement, though unofficial, put the spotlight on the so-called “super shoes,” which have since become a staple in long-distance running. These shoes, with their energy-returning foam and rigid plates, improve running economy and have been linked to numerous new records. As a result, World Athletics, the governing body for track and field, introduced new regulations to limit the height of shoe heels and the number of rigid plates allowed.

Below is a short explainer ( here a JERSEY ) so as to how these mechanism work. Translating technological superiority into better athletic performance :


The Fairness Debate :

The main issue with technological doping is the perceived unfairness. Not all athletes have access to the latest technology, which can create a significant gap in performance. For instance, Nike-sponsored athletes may have an advantage simply because they have access to the best shoes. This has led to some athletes dropping their sponsorships with other brands just to compete in Nike shoes.

Moreover, the rules governing what technology is allowed are often inconsistent across different sports. For example, while there are strict regulations on sock length in cycling, running has no such restrictions. The line between what is fair and what constitutes an unfair advantage is often blurry, leading to ongoing debates within the sporting community.

Is Technological Doping Inevitable?

Some experts argue that technological advancements are an inevitable part of elite sports. Andy Miah, a professor at the University of Salford, suggests that trying to resist the integration of technology into sports might be futile. He believes that elite sports have always been a combination of natural ability and technological enhancement. In fact, he argues that the pursuit of innovation is what makes high-level competition so exciting and dynamic.

Way Forward :

As technology continues to evolve, so too will the debates surrounding its use in sports. The line between fair competition and technological enhancement will likely remain a contentious issue, especially as new innovations emerge. For now, the challenge lies in finding a balance that allows for both technological progress and fair play, ensuring that the spirit of competition remains intact in the Olympic Games and beyond.

Tuesday, 13 August 2024

IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION

 

IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION - CAPTURE MIND ---> CAPTURE TERRITORY :


In Mathematics there's a concept of ðŸ”º ( delta )... Basically it denotes  infinitesimally small changes brought in so that there's negligible difference between the predecessor and successor states ... The same delta (🔺)  happens to be prevalent/injected into our Psycho-sociological constructs ... Need to be highly vigilant in these turbulent times ... What you see, what you perceive isn't actually what you are being served...


This delta (🔺) in a panoramic term is what is often referred as "IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION" ... It's a long term strategy that may take years or even decades which relies heavily on the use of media, education, institutions and what not... to shape public opinion and influence the thinking of key decision makers.


Enclosed here is a very basic analogy drawn between the "parallels in BANGLADESH" & "partial successful pursuits of the same in INDIA" : 






DO NOT LET ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING CAPTURE YOUR MIND !!



Preliminary Report @ AIC 171 Crash - Raises More Questions Rather Than Answering !!

( Report can be accessed here - https://aaib.gov.in/What's%20New%20Assets/Preliminary%20Report%20VT-ANB.pdf  ) The preliminary report on...